Prostate Cancer Ontology
Center for Systems Biology, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Sichuan China
跳过导航链接。
折叠 前列腺癌前列腺癌
展开 前列腺癌流行病学前列腺癌流行病学
展开 前列腺癌的诊断前列腺癌的诊断
折叠 前列腺癌的治疗前列腺癌的治疗
展开 延期治疗延期治疗
展开 外科手术外科手术
展开 放射疗法放射疗法
展开 冷冻疗法冷冻疗法
展开 激素疗法激素疗法
展开 化疗化疗
展开 去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)
展开 转移性前列腺癌转移性前列腺癌
折叠 其他治疗方式其他治疗方式
展开 老年男性前列腺癌的治疗老年男性前列腺癌的治疗
展开 局部前列腺癌除手术和放疗以外的其他初级治疗选择局部前列腺癌除手术和放疗以外的其他初级治疗选择
展开 局部前列腺癌患者的治疗后生活质量局部前列腺癌患者的治疗后生活质量
折叠 根治性目的治疗后仅限PSA复发的治疗根治性目的治疗后仅限PSA复发的治疗
肿瘤预后
Preferred Name Oncological outcomes
Definition In cases in which RT fails, salvage cryoablation of the prostate (SCAP) has been proposed as an alternative to SRP, as it has a potentially lower risk of morbidity and equal efficacy. However, the very few studies available have shown disappointing results. In a review of the use of SCAP for recurrent cancer after RT, the 5-year BDFS estimates ranged from 50-70%. A durable response can be achieved in ~50% of patients with a pre-SCAP PSA < 10 ng/mL . In a multicentre study reporting the current outcome of SCAP in 279 patients,
the 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS) estimate according to the Phoenix criteria was 54.5± 4.9%. Positive biopsies were observed in 15/46 patients (32.6%) who underwent prostate biopsy after SCAP.
A case-matched control study comparing SRP and SCAP was performed in men with recurrent PCa
after RT. The authors compared the oncological outcomes of the two salvage treatment options after mean follow-up periods of 7.8 (SRP group) and 5.5 years (SCAP group). The 5-year BCR-FS was 61% following SRP,significantly better than the 21% detected after SCAP. The 5-year OS was also significantly higher in the SRP group (95% vs.85%).
Synonyms & Abbreviations Oncological outcomes
ReferenceCode NA
ReferenceURL NA
PMID NA
Copyright (C) 2022 Institutes for Systems Genetics, Sichuan University West China Hospital. All Rights Reserved.